Event 2: From Forces to Forms: Episode 1 "Laws of Nature"
For my second event of the quarter, I decided to attend episode 1 of “Forces to Forms” that featured many presenters, as well as Dr. Vesna herself. Hosted by the Pratt Gallery in Manhattan, the event itself largely focused on the link between art and science in relation to the laws of nature.
Figure 1. Proof of attendance.
My favorite presentation was
by Todd Siler. As a science aficionado, I get very excited when I hear of emerging
technology that can potentially change the world. So when Siler said that he
was trying to find a way to recreate the sun by modelling fractals, my
curiosity was immediately piqued.
Figure 2. Todd Siler, The Fractal Engine, 2022.
The fractal reactor model was
engineered based on fractal geometry (as opposed to Euclidean geometry) as an
example of a device that could generate limitless energy via nuclear fusion. While
the reactor itself has yet to be developed, the idea itself is revolutionary in
that science and art have rendered an idea about the world into a form that
allows general viewers to grasp said idea. A similar situation took place when neuroscientist
Danielle Bassett and her team created neural networks in a physical space to
see the data from an artistic lens ergo allowing them to better understand the
complexities of the brain. Her project gives us a radical new model of the
brain that could later change the way we understand how it functions.
While this gives impression
that science and art are the quintessential tool to change the world, it
remains a question of how they can combine and engage with each other more
commonly. Martin Kemp, an expert in science and art, agrees that this issue of
imagining and comprehending high level ideas is uncommon. Janet Echelman’s “She
Changes” project evinces this further; Echelman used fibers and poles to
design an elaborate sculpture in Portugal to reflect the heritage of Porto and
Matosinho. However, when creating this large model, she faced several
challenges majorly relating to science. Several variables ranging from weather
to the type of material used had to be considered to produce a safe, standing figure.
Figure 3. Janet Echelman, She Changes, 2022.
To do so, Echelman states that she had to create her own computation tools to produce a working model. Indeed, this is one solution the aforementioned problem. Alternative approaches include active collaboration between artists and scientists, as well as STEAM education (Snow).
Works Cited
Campbell, Sarah. “Danielle Bassett.” EMBS, 18 July 2016, https://www.embs.org/pulse/articles/danielle-bassett/.
Cressey, Daniel. “Physics: Modelling Feynman.” Nature, vol. 489, no. 7415, 2012, pp. 207–207., https://doi.org/10.1038/489207a.
Kemp, Martin. “From Science in Art to the Art of Science.” Nature, vol. 434, no. 7031, 2005, pp. 308–309., https://doi.org/10.1038/434308a.
Levy, Ellen. "From Forces to Forms: Episode 1 "Laws of Nature." Pratt Gallery Manhattan, uploaded by Art | Sci Center, 2 Apr. 2022, https://vimeo.com/692460809
“She Changes, Porto, Portugal, 2005.” Janet Echelman, https://www.echelman.com/project/she-changes.
Siler, Todd. “Fractal Reactor: Re-Creating the Sun.” Leonardo, vol. 40, no. 3, 2007, pp. 270–278., https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2007.40.3.270.
Snow, C. P. The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press, 1959.
Vesna, Victoria. “Toward a Third Culture: Being in Between.” Leonardo, vol. 34, no. 2, 2001, pp. 121–125., https://doi.org/10.1162/002409401750184672.
Zhu, Lian, and Yogesh Goyal. “Art and Science.” EMBO Reports, vol. 20, no. 2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201847061.



Comments
Post a Comment